The inclusion of genetically engineered crops and feed additives in livestock and poultry feed, in pet foods, and directly into the human food chain is a major health concern.
This is especially true with processed foods and beverages containing corn and soy ingredients.
And I want to tell you why.
Genetically Engineered Crops
Genetically engineered (GE) and genetically modified (GM) plants — “Frankenfoods” to critics — contain artificially inserted genes from viruses, bacteria, other plant species, and insects, humans, and other animals. This process can result in the production of entirely novel chemicals that were never before present in our foods or those of farmed and companion animals. Alien gene insertion can cause a deficiency of normal nutrients in GE/GM crops, while other naturally occurring plant substances may become so concentrated as to become toxic.
GE plants are created primarily to increase their resistance to herbicides and insect pests. Both the U.S. government and the multinational corporations patenting and selling these seeds of potential destruction to farmers to plant crops that go to human, pet food and livestock feed manufacturers would have us believe that GE crops and food ingredients are safe, and that to believe otherwise is to not trust in science and progress.
In 2006, an estimated 136 million acres of U.S. cropland were used to grow GM crops. Some 89 percent of soybeans and 61 percent of corn crops are now genetically engineered. Canola is also genetically engineered, and vegetable oils (canola and corn) along with soy protein and lecithin, are used widely in a variety of prepared foods for people and their pets. Genetically engineered sugar beet will soon be planted widely as a source of sugar for the food industry. Beet pulp is a common ingredient in pet foods. GM wheat is also on the horizon.
Commodity producers™ adoption of GE crops in the United States, prohibited in many other countries, has been dramatic, according the U.S. Department of Agriculture (see graph at top of article).
This adoption by contracted producers is not unexpected, since a handful of powerful pharmaceutical and agrichemical multinational corporations like Bayer and Monsanto, have gained a monopolistic control over the major commodity crop seed stocks, making available to farmers only their highly promoted, patented varieties of GE seeds. Farmers then sell these commodities to livestock feed companies and to the food, beverage, candy, and cosmetic industries—companies like Mars, Nestle©., Colgate-Palmolive, and Procter Gamble. These four multinationals monopolize the pet food industry, selling such familiar and widely advertised brands as Hill™s Science Diet, Purina, Pedigree, Iams, and Eukanuba. It is no coincidence that pet health insurance plans are being marketed by one of these companies.
In essence, the mainstream pet food industry, a subsidiary of agribusiness, profitably recycles human food and beverage industry by-products, and livestock and poultry parts considered unfit for human consumption, into pet foods. (For details see Not Fit For a Dog: The Truth About Manufactured Dog and Cat Food, reference below.)
Some of the Risks
Numerous issues and unanswered questions surround the safety of these GE/GM crops and foods. In their recent review, Dona & Arvanitoyannis (2009) conclude, “The results of most of the rather few studies conducted with GM foods indicate that they may cause hepatic, pancreatic, renal, and reproductive effects and may alter hematological, biochemical, and immunologic parameters the significance of which remains unknown. The above results indicate that many GM foods have some common toxic effects. Therefore, further studies should be conducted in order to elucidate the mechanism dominating this action. Small amounts of ingested DNA may not be broken down under digestive processes and there is a possibility that this DNA may either enter the bloodstream or be excreted, especially in individuals with abnormal digestion as a result of chronic gastrointestinal disease or with immunodeficiency.”
The insecticidal poison Bt (Bacillus thuringiensis) is present in most genetically engineered U.S. commodity crops that go into animal feed and pet foods. High levels of Bt toxin in GM crops have made farmers ill and poisoned farm animals eating crop residues. Bt toxin harms microorganisms in the soil vital to plant health, high levels being created when GM crop residues are mulched or ploughed into the soil.
Genetic material in GM herbicide-resistant soybeans can be transferred to bacteria in our digestive systems. This means that foreign proteins could be manufactured in our own digestive systems by such bacteria, turning them into pesticide factories.
So called ‘overexpression’ can occur when spliced genes that manufacture chemicals such as Bt become hyperactive inside the plant and result in potentially toxic plant tissues. These are lethal not just to meal worms and other crop pests, but also to, birds, butterflies, other wildlife, and possibly to humans and their pets.
The herbicides glufosinate and glyphosate are liberally applied across the U.S. and in many other countries to millions of acres of crops genetically engineered to be resistant to these herbicides. These poisons are actually absorbed by the crops, while all else growing in the fields and much of the surrounding aquatic life in rivers and lakes, are wiped out. These widely used herbicides and additives therein have caused kidney damage and other health problems in animals, can cause endocrine disruption and birth defects in frogs and is lethal to many amphibians. Glyphosate has been linked with non-Hodgkin lymphoma, miscarriages and premature births in humans.
These herbicides and other agrichemicals, along with the insecticide Bt, are found in pet foods and the crops and crop by-products fed to cattle, pigs, poultry, and dairy cows.
How Is This Harming Your Dog?
Many nutritionists and health experts are linking the rise in human food allergies—skin problems and inflammatory/irritable bowel syndromes— to the increased consumption of GM foods and food additives, especially genetically engineered soy products that contain novel proteins. The high incidence of skin and food allergies, and other suspected allergies associated with digestive disorders and inflammatory bowel disease in dogs and cats may well be caused or aggravated by these novel proteins and other chemical contaminants in GM crop byproducts.
I have seen a dramatic increase in these problems over the past decade in the thousands of letters I receive from cat and dog owners who read my syndicated newspaper column Animal Doctor. It is surely no coincidence that the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported, in October 2008, an 18 percent increase in allergies in children under the age of 18 between the years 1997 and 2007. Some 3 million children now suffer from food or digestive allergies, with symptoms including vomiting, skin rashes, and breathing problems. They take longer to outgrow milk and egg allergies and show a doubling of adverse reactions to peanuts.
Almost every independent animal feeding safety study has shown adverse or unexplained effects of GM foods, including: Inflammation and abnormal cell growth (possibly pre-cancerous) in the stomach and small intestines; abnormal development, inflammation, and cellular changes in the liver, kidney, testicles, heart, pancreas, brain; and poor growth and higher mortalities than normal.
Researchers have found that unlike conventionally bred crops, GM varieties are intrinsically unstable and prone to spontaneous mutations. When mutations occur, you can never know if what is being grown, harvested, processed, and consumed is really safe and nutritious.
The inserted genes can have unforeseen consequences, so-called multiple pleiotropic effects. These unpredictable consequences of introducing a new genetic trait or quality include alterations in existing gene function and relationships with other genes. A dramatic example of this in animals is in the genetically engineered pigs that were created to carry human growth genes at the U.S. government’s research facility in Beltsville, Md. These pigs became crippled, suffering from multiple health problems including arthritis and bone-growth deformities, and had impaired immune and reproductive systems. Multiple pleiotropic effects in GM soy include excesses of certain phytoestrogens, and the presence of anti-nutrient substances, some of which could be a consequence of genomic interaction with mutagenic agrichemicals compounded by the poor nutrition (and nutritive value) of conventionally grown, rather than organically grown, crops.
GM seeds are genetically unstable because they are more prone than normal to undergo spontaneous mutations. This can mean that GM crops could produce novel, harmful proteins, excessive, even toxic amounts of normal nutrients, or become extremely deficient in same: Spontaneous mutations = genetic roulette.
The delicate bacterial balance in the digestive systems of man and beast alike is disrupted by herbicide food residues and possibly by the mutagenic, unknown consequences of transgenic DNA segments (from the genes of all GM foods) becoming incorporated into the bacterial DNA.
What’s The Alternative?
My advice to consumers and pet owners alike is to look for the USDA Organic certification label on foods, since the government has resisted attempts to have GE/GM products appropriately labeled. Read the labels on prepared foods and avoid those that contain corn and soy products (including cooking oils), since these are most likely to have come from GE/GM crops. Corn and soy ingredients have no place in pet foods, especially in cat foods, even if they are from conventional, non-GE/GM varieties, because of their association with a variety of health problems in companion animals. These include allergies, skin problems, periodontal disease, inflammatory bowel disease, and cystitis. But they are widely used because of their low cost as cheap sources of calories and protein.
Organically certified foods of both animal and plant origin contain more essential nutrients, notably antioxidants, than conventionally grown produce, and of course cause less environmental harms and are pesticide and GE/GM free.
For documentation, see Cooper, J., Leifert, C., and Niggily, U. (eds.), Handbook of Food Quality and Safety, Cambridge, UK, Woodhead Publ. Inc., 2007.
Images: Rapid growth in adoption of GE crops continues in the U.S.—Economics Research Service, USDA.
Benachour, N.H., et al. “Time- and dose-dependent effects of Roundup on human embryonic and placental cells.” Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 53(1):126-133(8). July 2007.
Benbrook,C. Genetically Engineered Crops and Pesticide Use in the United States: The First Nine Years; BioTech InfoNet, Technical Paper Number 7. October 2004 (.pdf file; requires Adobe Reader).
Domingo, J.L. “Toxicity Studies of Genetically Modified Plants: A Review of the Published Literature.” Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 47(8):721 733. 2007.
Dona, A., and Arvanitoyannis, I. “Health risks of genetically modified foods.” Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. 49: 164-175. 2009.
Ermakova, I. “Genetically modified soy affects posterity: Results of Russian scientistsâ€™ studies.” Available online at http://www.regnum.ru/english/526651.html. 2005.
Finamore A., et al. “Intestinal and peripheral immune response to MON810 maize ingestion in weaning and old mice.” Journal of Agricultural Food Chemistry. 56(23):11533 11539. 2008.
Fox, M.W., Hodgkins, E., and Smart, M. Not Fit For A Dog: The Truth About Manufactured Dog and Cat Food. Sanger, Calif., Quill Driver Books, 2009.
Fox, M.W. Killer Foods: What Scientists Do To Make Genes Better Is Not Always Best. Guilford, Conn., The Lyons Press, 2004.
Ho, M.W., Ryan, A., and Cummins, J. “Hazards of transgenic plants
containing the cauliflower mosaic virus promoter.” Microbial Ecology in Health and Disease, 12(3):189 198. 2000.
Kilic, A., and Akay, M.T. “A three generation study with genetically modified Bt corn in rats: Biochemical and histopathological investigation.” Food and Chemical Toxicology. 46(3): 1164-1170. 2008.
Malatesta, M., et al., “Hepatoma tissue culture (HTC) cells as a model for investigating the effects of low concentrations of herbicide on cell structure and function.” Toxicology in Vitro, 22(8): 1853-1860. December 2008.
Pusztai, A., Bardocz, S., and Ewen, S.W.B. “Genetically Modified Foods: Potential Human Health Effects.” Dâ Mello, J.P.F., ed., Food Safety: Contaminants and Toxins, pp. 347â€“372, CAB International, Wallingford Oxon, UK, 2003. (.pdf file; requires Adobe Reader.)
Seralini, G.E., Cellier, D., and de Venomois, J.S. “New analysis of a rat feeding study with a genetically modified maize reveals signs of hepatorenal toxicity.” Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 52(4):596-602. 2007 May. Epub 2007 Mar 13.
Smith, J.M. “Genetic Roulette: The Documented Health Risks of Genetically Engineered Foods”. Also visit his website, Seeds of Deception.
Traavik, T., and Heinemann, J. “Genetic Engineering and Omitted Health Research: Still No Answers to Ageing Questions.” TWN Biotechnology & Biosafety Series 7, 2007.
Velimirov A., Binter, C., and Zentek, J. “Biological effects of transgenic maize NK603xMON810 fed in long term reproduction studies in mice.” Report, Forschungsberichte der Sektion IV, Band 3. Institut hrung, and Forschungsinttitut fur biologischen Landbau, Vienna, Austria, November 2008.
Wilson, A.K, Latham, J.R., and Steinbrecher, R.A. “Transformation-induced mutations in transgenic plants: Analysis and biosafety implications.” Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering Reviews, 23, p 209-226, 2006.